<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CRC Subdivision Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/</link>
	<description>from The Office @ Artisan Square</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/comment-page-1/#comment-24050</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/#comment-24050</guid>
		<description>With all due respect Doug.  I am not so sure that the CRC land is as nationally recognized as you are portraying it to be. I am sure if it were, either the provincial or even federal government would have stepped in and acquired the lands in question and turned it into a preserve of park long before now.  It is  my understanding that you and Councillor Poole were suppose to report back to council  regarding your efforts on this very matter by the end of June.  What are your findings?

For me I will trust  Mr Slegtenhorst&#039; s wisdom and integrity to indeed do the right and legal thing and approve  the proposal if it  meets all the requirements  contained out in the OCP and not succumb to the pressures of special interest groups such as the one that  you were a member of  and Council Poole was a director of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect Doug.  I am not so sure that the CRC land is as nationally recognized as you are portraying it to be. I am sure if it were, either the provincial or even federal government would have stepped in and acquired the lands in question and turned it into a preserve of park long before now.  It is  my understanding that you and Councillor Poole were suppose to report back to council  regarding your efforts on this very matter by the end of June.  What are your findings?</p>
<p>For me I will trust  Mr Slegtenhorst&#8217; s wisdom and integrity to indeed do the right and legal thing and approve  the proposal if it  meets all the requirements  contained out in the OCP and not succumb to the pressures of special interest groups such as the one that  you were a member of  and Council Poole was a director of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Hooper</title>
		<link>http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/comment-page-1/#comment-24027</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/#comment-24027</guid>
		<description>Even an ostrich comes up for air! Here’s the orientation with respect to any proposed development at Cape Roger Curtis.

Bowen Island’s Official Community Plan and Land Use Bylaw both point to the unique attributes found on the Cape Roger Curtis lands and marine environments. In February 2006, Council endorsed further clarification of the ‘public interest’ by way of its municipal framework resolution. The public clearly expressed its perspectives on the Cape lands during the recent so-called ‘Neighbourhood Plan’ deliberation. Importantly, under the Islands Trust authority, the Bowen Island Municipality’s duty with regard to land use planning is broadly considered. The Trust’s policy statement reads:

““The object of the Trust is to preserve and protect the Trust Area and its unique amenities and environment for the benefit of the residents of the Trust Area and of British Columbia generally, in cooperation with municipalities, regional districts, improvement districts, other persons and organizations and the government of British Columbia.”

Given the nationally recognized ecological and archaeological significance of the Cape Roger Curtis lands, as well as the property’s unique regional recreational amenities, consideration of any development proposal on the Cape lands ought to, by statute, be comprehensive in its scope and integrity. I believe this provides a clear framework for the Approving Officer to exercise their duty and authority with regard to a subdivision application on the Cape lands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even an ostrich comes up for air! Here’s the orientation with respect to any proposed development at Cape Roger Curtis.</p>
<p>Bowen Island’s Official Community Plan and Land Use Bylaw both point to the unique attributes found on the Cape Roger Curtis lands and marine environments. In February 2006, Council endorsed further clarification of the ‘public interest’ by way of its municipal framework resolution. The public clearly expressed its perspectives on the Cape lands during the recent so-called ‘Neighbourhood Plan’ deliberation. Importantly, under the Islands Trust authority, the Bowen Island Municipality’s duty with regard to land use planning is broadly considered. The Trust’s policy statement reads:</p>
<p>““The object of the Trust is to preserve and protect the Trust Area and its unique amenities and environment for the benefit of the residents of the Trust Area and of British Columbia generally, in cooperation with municipalities, regional districts, improvement districts, other persons and organizations and the government of British Columbia.”</p>
<p>Given the nationally recognized ecological and archaeological significance of the Cape Roger Curtis lands, as well as the property’s unique regional recreational amenities, consideration of any development proposal on the Cape lands ought to, by statute, be comprehensive in its scope and integrity. I believe this provides a clear framework for the Approving Officer to exercise their duty and authority with regard to a subdivision application on the Cape lands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/comment-page-1/#comment-24022</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/#comment-24022</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment Hendrik. Welcome to Bowen. For those of you who don&#039;t know, Mr. Slegtenhorst is our new Chief Administative Officer. On Bowen that job also includes being our Approving Officer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment Hendrik. Welcome to Bowen. For those of you who don&#8217;t know, Mr. Slegtenhorst is our new Chief Administative Officer. On Bowen that job also includes being our Approving Officer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendrik Slegtenhorst</title>
		<link>http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/comment-page-1/#comment-24019</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendrik Slegtenhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bowenbulletin.artisanoffice.com/2009/07/02/crc-subdivision-update/#comment-24019</guid>
		<description>Yours is a very useful summary. I would only comment at this point that it&#039;s my intent to consult as widely as practical before making any ruling. By widely I mean community, council, staff, and developer. I have already been in preliminary discussions with council and staff, including the outgoing AO, our planners, and our legal advisor. I look forward to advice and information as well from the community, and to interaction with the developer. Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yours is a very useful summary. I would only comment at this point that it&#8217;s my intent to consult as widely as practical before making any ruling. By widely I mean community, council, staff, and developer. I have already been in preliminary discussions with council and staff, including the outgoing AO, our planners, and our legal advisor. I look forward to advice and information as well from the community, and to interaction with the developer. Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

